---

• Home

---

• About

---

• NE SARE Project 2010
  • Modified Cornell
  • SARE Patternator
  • SARE with Screens

---

• Testing & Results 2010
  • Total Output
  • Berthoud Disks
  • TeeJet Disks
  • Total Recovery

---

• Conclusions 2010

---

• NE SARE Project 2012
  • Paper Patternator
  • Materials

---

• Testing & Results 2012
  Cornell and Sare
  • Total Output
  • Berthoud Discs
  • Total Spray Recovery

---

• Testing & Results 2012
  Paper Patternator
  • Droplet Density
  • Droplet Size
  • Percent Coverage

---

• Conclusions 2012

---

Patternator Results - 2010

Patternator Tests with Berthoud Saphirex 10 discs

Spray collected from Berthoud discs (right side)

See the complete statistical results from these tests.

The SARE patternator captured significantly more spray material than the Cornell patternator on all panels except the bottom panel (#1) that was positioned at 1 to 2 feet off the ground. The top panel (#7) was significant at the 5% level while the 2nd through 6th panels were significantly different at the 1% level.

The addition of screens to the SARE WITH SCREENS patternator did not provide any improvement and actually decreased its efficiency slightly. On the top (#7) and bottom (#1) panels there was no significant difference with the Cornell patternator. The 2nd and 6th panel were significant at the 5% level, while the panels in the middle (#3,4,5) were significant at the 1% level.

There were some significant differences between the SARE patternator and the SARE WITH SCREENS patternator. On the top panel (#7), significantly more spray material was captured at a 5% level of significance by the SARE patternator. The same result was found on panels #3 and #1.